Briana Veliz
AP English
January 19,2014
Civil
Disobedience
Civil disobedience is the active, public,
contentious breach of the law to bring a change in law or public policy. Martin
Luther king shows civil disobedience in his letter from Birmingham jail
highlighting racial injustice and explaining moral arguments distinguishing
between just and unjust laws. Nonviolence and civil disobedience as opposed to
violence and conflict can still be a viable path toward gaining political and
civil rights worldwide. There were many accounts that led to martins march
towards city hall one being segregation at lunch counters and discrimination in
hiring.
Martin Luther king as a brilliant and
eloquent leader took matters into his hands when racial segregation in public
schools, police brutality, separation of public restrooms or restaurants
reached an ultimate high of inequality, and decided to form a peaceful march to
city hall were attack dogs and fire hoses were turned against the protestors
many who were in their early teens or younger and were martin Luther king was
arrested and jailed for leading these protests.
“ just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create tension In the
mind , so must we see the need for nonviolent gadflies to create the kind of
tension to society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice
and racism to the majestic heights of understanding brotherhood” throughout his
letter to Birmingham he embraces and justifies the importance of tension, he is
also careful to not stress that the tension he supports is “nonviolent” he also
states Socrates as a archetype of wisdom. He tries to imply that since Socrates
was right to create tension so that the mind could grow and tension is good for
inspiring mankind to grow. All the actions martin Luther king took to get his
message across about the inequality in races were considered civil disobedience
because he was breaking unjust laws and was willing to accept the penalty.
Such an act of disobedience such a martin
Luther king took would be very similar in our world today in many aspects.
There’s has been many peaceful protests recently were the protestors are asking
for a higher pay in wage or the equal rights of marriage, or the stop of police
brutality. These are all examples of peaceful marches were in a professed way
many are refusing to obey certain laws, demands, or commands of the government.
Many acts of civil disobedience are also similar in the way that even through
peaceful protests police brutality is still a major component of people going
against unjust laws and forming petitions. To form such a protest or march
would be effective today because we have the right to assemble and right to
freedom of speech which our government takes into consideration. We also have
broadcast networks which gives the audience an outlook on what should be
changed. Although many will say that civil disobedience doesn’t help earn
anything if you want something changed you have to have power or have some say
in the creating of laws or decisions made in office or you will just be shot
down and killed. The strategy of civil disobedience such as martin Luther king
advised his protestors would make offenders such as police look more brutal and
downgrading unlike the protestors who are peacefully asking for their rights
and respect.
The act of civil disobedience also helps
bring attention and moral concept that there are times when law and justice do
not coincide. In many circumstances the relatively weak must find tactics of
confrontation that avoid the opponents strengths, and take advantage of peoples
limited strengths and which help illuminate the issue. The vital act of civil
disobedience has the ability to function through a multitude of perspectives an
unsatisfied can undertake a process of civil disobedience in their
individualized fashion. But nether less the result of any act of disobedience
is not meant to benefit the individual but the community at large or even the
whole country. The ends of such an act should not be a private gain but a
public gain.
Martin Luther king consciously offered a
middle way that addresses the great inequalities of segregation in his letter
to Birmingham and stops short of calling for a violent confrontation with the
government, although in his letter he is not suggesting that he act of
nonviolent civil disobedience is a tactic plays in the rule of law but is
something that acts outside the law and what people usually don’t use as a
strategy for confrontation. In his letter he clearly states that his strategy
is to purposely break laws that are unjust and unfair to certain people. And
the important point here is that kings movement for civil rights was
successful, in the long term because they eventually resolved a huge situation
that wasn’t going away. Marin Luther offered a simple choice “ witness your
country ripped in half and descend into chaos, or follow his middle path or
reform and civil rights”.
Try to stay away from the definition introduction where you basically define a key term within the prompt. This makes the essay seem a bit plain and not interesting enough to keep the reader drawn to the writing. The historical background is decent, but more interesting facts can be added. The evidence is fine and supports your thesis in the following paragraphs.
ReplyDelete